<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: STEERING GROUP LAUNCHED TO VOICE CONCERNS ON WASTE PLANT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baggyshanker.com/steering-group-launched-to-voice-concerns-on-waste-plant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baggyshanker.com/steering-group-launched-to-voice-concerns-on-waste-plant/</link>
	<description>Sinfin &#38; Osmaston Labour Councillor, Derby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ryan</title>
		<link>http://baggyshanker.com/steering-group-launched-to-voice-concerns-on-waste-plant/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baggyshanker.com/?p=101#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Is Martin KIngston QC aware that the &quot;the advice of the Government agency&quot; he thinks should be accepted with regard to health impact of Sinfin waste plant is worthless?

&quot;Egg-on-face&quot; is something all barristers need to avoid as it makes them seem less wonderful than they like to think.

The &quot;egg&quot; is on Hansard website (30 November 2009, Column 539W) and is the written reply to Parliamentary Question by Paul Holmes MP in which Dept of Health admit no studies around incinerators and ends with Health Protection Agency advising that no such studies are carried out:

http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm091130/text/91130w0038.htm

Perhaps Martin Kingston QC will be able to tell the public inquiry how anyone can tell whether or not existing &quot;energy from waste plants&quot; are causing any adverse effects on the health of residents?

I suggest that he gets RRS to examine infant mortality rates at electoral ward level around incinerators, power stations and oil refineries in England &amp; Wales as the wards with high death rates &quot;just happen to be&quot; where exposure to emissions from such installations are greatest.

The Health Protection Agency&#039;s CEO has admitted no relevant health studies around incinerators in this letter to me:

http://www.ukhr.org/incineration/justinmccracken8june2009.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Martin KIngston QC aware that the &#8220;the advice of the Government agency&#8221; he thinks should be accepted with regard to health impact of Sinfin waste plant is worthless?</p>
<p>&#8220;Egg-on-face&#8221; is something all barristers need to avoid as it makes them seem less wonderful than they like to think.</p>
<p>The &#8220;egg&#8221; is on Hansard website (30 November 2009, Column 539W) and is the written reply to Parliamentary Question by Paul Holmes MP in which Dept of Health admit no studies around incinerators and ends with Health Protection Agency advising that no such studies are carried out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm091130/text/91130w0038.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm091130/text/91130w0038.htm</a></p>
<p>Perhaps Martin Kingston QC will be able to tell the public inquiry how anyone can tell whether or not existing &#8220;energy from waste plants&#8221; are causing any adverse effects on the health of residents?</p>
<p>I suggest that he gets RRS to examine infant mortality rates at electoral ward level around incinerators, power stations and oil refineries in England &amp; Wales as the wards with high death rates &#8220;just happen to be&#8221; where exposure to emissions from such installations are greatest.</p>
<p>The Health Protection Agency&#8217;s CEO has admitted no relevant health studies around incinerators in this letter to me:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ukhr.org/incineration/justinmccracken8june2009.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ukhr.org/incineration/justinmccracken8june2009.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh ullyatt</title>
		<link>http://baggyshanker.com/steering-group-launched-to-voice-concerns-on-waste-plant/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh ullyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baggyshanker.com/?p=101#comment-43</guid>
		<description>my spelling must improve
i have done a mega amount of work to try and protect myself from possible injury in derby by virue of burning waste
it has been a hard road like facing some darkness or the unknown that is a danger but hidden
i sense a lot is hidden to uncover it is essential but scary
i have submitted some objections but as of today i still have a lot more material i want to submit to council to make sure it is taken into account and like i say make sure i do my best to protect what is precious to me
i sent stuff to sheffield for environment agence hearing too
anyone think the same as me about this id love to hear from you by e mail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my spelling must improve<br />
i have done a mega amount of work to try and protect myself from possible injury in derby by virue of burning waste<br />
it has been a hard road like facing some darkness or the unknown that is a danger but hidden<br />
i sense a lot is hidden to uncover it is essential but scary<br />
i have submitted some objections but as of today i still have a lot more material i want to submit to council to make sure it is taken into account and like i say make sure i do my best to protect what is precious to me<br />
i sent stuff to sheffield for environment agence hearing too<br />
anyone think the same as me about this id love to hear from you by e mail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh ullyatt</title>
		<link>http://baggyshanker.com/steering-group-launched-to-voice-concerns-on-waste-plant/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh ullyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baggyshanker.com/?p=101#comment-42</guid>
		<description>i spoke to you on phone about incinerator issue
i told council today that there is no proper inforned public debate and some  of the most basic risk questions have not been thought about
is the RR plan next door the nuclear reaearch plant is it time RR told us how othersise can risk of a disaster be assessed
Reckits - Incinerator - Diesel tanks - refuelling trucks on site - railay line bordering site - high teck or radioactive plant next door - who is thinking - are they quite sane ?
i have 50 other objections and detailed knowledge of dioxins
please contact me soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i spoke to you on phone about incinerator issue<br />
i told council today that there is no proper inforned public debate and some  of the most basic risk questions have not been thought about<br />
is the RR plan next door the nuclear reaearch plant is it time RR told us how othersise can risk of a disaster be assessed<br />
Reckits &#8211; Incinerator &#8211; Diesel tanks &#8211; refuelling trucks on site &#8211; railay line bordering site &#8211; high teck or radioactive plant next door &#8211; who is thinking &#8211; are they quite sane ?<br />
i have 50 other objections and detailed knowledge of dioxins<br />
please contact me soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

